<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Landry Hat &#187; kc chiefs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thelandryhat.com/tag/kc-chiefs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thelandryhat.com</link>
	<description>A Dallas Cowboys Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:00:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Degenerate Gambler Picks for Week 1</title>
		<link>http://thelandryhat.com/2010/09/11/degenerate-gambler-picks-for-week-1/</link>
		<comments>http://thelandryhat.com/2010/09/11/degenerate-gambler-picks-for-week-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 00:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cowboys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cincinatti Bengals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kc chiefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ravens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego Chargers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Redskins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelandryhat.com/?p=4049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>No one should follow these picks. Normally I&#8217;m right around 50/50, so I&#8217;m on pace with a buffalo nickel. A few thoughts I have about gambling are as follows: don&#8217;t do it, don&#8217;t believe anyone else has an inside track, don&#8217;t bet on the NFL, and don&#8217;t bet on the Cowboys or Steelers. The final [...]</p><p><a href="http://thelandryhat.com/2010/09/11/degenerate-gambler-picks-for-week-1/">Degenerate Gambler Picks for Week 1</a> - <a href="http://thelandryhat.com">The Landry Hat</a> - <a href="http://thelandryhat.com">The Landry Hat - A Dallas Cowboys Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one should follow these picks.  Normally I&#8217;m right around 50/50, so I&#8217;m on pace with a buffalo nickel.  A few thoughts I have about gambling are as follows: don&#8217;t do it, don&#8217;t believe anyone else has an inside track, don&#8217;t bet on the NFL, and don&#8217;t bet on the <strong>Cowboys </strong>or <strong>Steelers</strong>.  The final caveat being that both teams have an enormous fan base.  A percentage of those fans will blindly bet on both teams to win which affects the movement of the point spread.  Ergo, every time anyone places a bet on the Cowboys or Steelers, they are making a riskier bet than if they were taking any other team in the league.</p>
<p>Now for the <a href="http://www.vegas.com/gaming/">picks </a>(there&#8217;s no system, no computer model, no clairvoyance, just good old fashioned guessing):</p>
<p>I like <strong>Carolina </strong>receiving 6.5 points against the <strong>Giants</strong>.  Carolina is my pick to win the NFC South.  I love their attitude, I love their personnel, and while I think the Giants will rebound this season, I can easily see Carolina winning in NY.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">Loser pick:  There were 9 turnovers in the game, which practically makes it unpredicatable.  This is why you don&#8217;t bet on the NFL. </span></strong></p>
<p>The second game I like are the <strong>Jets </strong>giving up 2.5 to the <strong>Ravens</strong>.  It&#8217;s not a secret that I do not like the Jets for the 2010 season as a Super Bowl contender.  So this won&#8217;t come as a surprise that I have them outright losing to the Ravens.  Take the money line, don&#8217;t take the money line.  Put a lock on it, don&#8217;t put a lock on it.  Either way.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;">Winner pick:  The big question is whether the Jets offense will be more productive against a weaker defense. Probably, because they couldn&#8217;t be much worse than they were against the Ravens. </span></p>
<p>This seems too good to be true.  <strong>Cincinnati </strong>getting 5.5 points against <strong>New England</strong>.  New England who has a variety of young players filling in due to injury.  A team that notoriously hides injuries has a list of 11 players either probable or questionable.  I like New England over the course of the season to win, but logic says to play Cincy.  That&#8217;s why I say avoid the game.  If it&#8217;s too good to be true, it is.  Other games that sound too good to be true are Dallas giving up only 3.5 to <strong>Washington</strong>, and <strong>San Diego</strong> giving up only 4.5 to the <strong>Chiefs</strong>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll keep tabs of my picks throughout the season and if I can be 10% better than a buffalo nickel, I&#8217;d be pretty satisfied.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;">This is a break even week, though I will be happy to mention that I told people not to throw good money after bad picks.  I&#8217;m 3-0 in my keep your money in your wallet picks!  Whoo!  Nothing ventured, nothing lost.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thelandryhat.com/2010/09/11/degenerate-gambler-picks-for-week-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 10/17 queries in 0.044 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 382/405 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fansided.com

 Served from: thelandryhat.com @ 2013-05-21 06:11:30 by W3 Total Cache -->