Cowboys vs. Redskins, My Kind of Rivalry

Prev3 of 6Next
Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse

I have to tell you, I was mind blown that anyone could be that stupid about his own football team. Now, in his defense I have learned that there is a peanut called a redskin. I did not know this at the time this conversation happened. To my utter shock he was dead serious. My first question would be, why isn’t the logo on the side of the helmet a peanut? Doesn’t that alone destroy his fantasy? Let me answer that, of course it does.

But what really destroys it is if you research the History of the team itself. Of you do that you will find that like many of the early NFL teams they took their first name from the more established Major League Baseball in the stadium where they played. Thus their original name, in 1932 when they had their genesis, was the Boston Braves. Now, someone who doesn’t know may say that the Braves are in Atlanta, not Boston. Yes, they are, but they too originated in Boston. In 1933 the team moved across town to play in Fenway Park, home of the Boston Red Sox. Their owner, George Preston Marshall, did not want to call his team that so he chose the mascot name Redskins.

Oct 6, 2013; Arlington, TX, USA; Dallas Cowboys receiver Cole Beasley (11) runs after a reception against Denver Broncos cornerback Tony Carter (32) at AT

Oct 6, 2013; Arlington, TX, USA; Dallas Cowboys receiver Cole Beasley (11) runs after a reception against Denver Broncos cornerback Tony Carter (32) at AT

Why would Mr. Marshall choose to name his Boston based team after a peanut indigenous to the District of Columbia? Exactly, he wouldn’t. They played for 5 seasons in Fenway and then moved to Washington and kept the name Redskins. So clearly the peanut idea was just a little beyond silly. The popular legend is that in 1933 Mr. Marshall opted for that nickname to honor his newly hired Head Coach, Sonny “Lonestar” Dietz. Lonestar had played at the Carlisle Indian School with the legendary Jim Thorpe under legendary Pop Warner.

Even if I could accept this legend as the true source of the mascot name, and I admit it is easier than the peanuts theory, it really doesn’t change the fact that George Preston Marshall, who chose and bestowed the name was the biggest racist in the History of the NFL. By clinging to his roots the team is clinging to their racist past. No one, not even a loyal Redskins fan should be able to deny the racist History of their franchise.

Prev3 of 6Next
Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse

Topics: Dallas Cowboys

Want more from The Landry Hat?  
Subscribe to FanSided Daily for your morning fix. Enter your email and stay in the know.
  • Gordon

    With everything going on this year with the Cowboys, you focus on a name? Seriously. Who cares what they’re called. There are a lot more reasons to dislike Washington’s team than their name. In fact, that’s about the least of Dallas’ problems with this team. They’re very good: they beat the Cowboys twice last year; they prevented Dallas from making the playoffs, etc., etc. and that’s just from last year. Get a life. Names mean nothing, unless your name is Super Bowl Champion.

  • fgoodwin

    I think the name is just fine — leave it alone.

17 hours ago

Dallas Cowboys Shouldn’t Worry About Offense

21 hours ago

Two Truths Cowboys Fans Must Remember For 2014 NFL Draft

1 day ago

The Top-3 Best and Worse Draft picks for the Cowboys in the 2000′s