<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bust Report: Anthony Spencer Sucks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thelandryhat.com/2009/10/01/bust-report-anthony-spencer-sucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thelandryhat.com/2009/10/01/bust-report-anthony-spencer-sucks/</link>
	<description>A Dallas Cowboys Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:54:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Colorblind</title>
		<link>http://thelandryhat.com/2009/10/01/bust-report-anthony-spencer-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-11823</link>
		<dc:creator>Colorblind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 20:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelandryhat.com/?p=2502#comment-11823</guid>
		<description>Watched Spencer on ever defensive play, thru two possessions he already has 3 pressures and a knockdown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watched Spencer on ever defensive play, thru two possessions he already has 3 pressures and a knockdown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davedallasfan</title>
		<link>http://thelandryhat.com/2009/10/01/bust-report-anthony-spencer-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-11822</link>
		<dc:creator>davedallasfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelandryhat.com/?p=2502#comment-11822</guid>
		<description>his number was 58 for all those die-hard old cowboy fans will remember........ware/spencer remind me of this pair......
56/58</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>his number was 58 for all those die-hard old cowboy fans will remember&#8230;&#8230;..ware/spencer remind me of this pair&#8230;&#8230;<br />
56/58</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davedallasfan</title>
		<link>http://thelandryhat.com/2009/10/01/bust-report-anthony-spencer-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-11821</link>
		<dc:creator>davedallasfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelandryhat.com/?p=2502#comment-11821</guid>
		<description>personally i think ware is a better overall well rounded lb then lawerence taylor was. nobody was as good as getting to the passer as was taylor(ware could be someday), but how many times did you hear how great he was in coverage. or how he ran a runner down from behind? not. ware is actually a great cover man and has had some interception opportunities in coverage? can anyone tell me who was the opposite side lb from taylor threw most of his career? if you remember the name, you&#039;ll also remember that he was never considered a great pass rusher, but was infact a good solid all round even probowl LB. think of the name and you&#039;ll see what i mean. BUT,.... this did take a couple of years to develop this tandem. it takes time. be patient, and in time i think we&#039;ll have the same?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>personally i think ware is a better overall well rounded lb then lawerence taylor was. nobody was as good as getting to the passer as was taylor(ware could be someday), but how many times did you hear how great he was in coverage. or how he ran a runner down from behind? not. ware is actually a great cover man and has had some interception opportunities in coverage? can anyone tell me who was the opposite side lb from taylor threw most of his career? if you remember the name, you&#8217;ll also remember that he was never considered a great pass rusher, but was infact a good solid all round even probowl LB. think of the name and you&#8217;ll see what i mean. BUT,&#8230;. this did take a couple of years to develop this tandem. it takes time. be patient, and in time i think we&#8217;ll have the same?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

