The Washington Times is Dead Wrong on Dirty Play Article

by Cowboys

The Washington Times digs deep in the gutter today for this article by Dan Daly about the play in the Cowboys-Eagles game Monday night. 

Mr. Daly contends that the Cowboys embarked on a mission to injure Brian Westbrook with dirty plays. The article certainly will please Eagles fans, but it is not an objective review of the game. 

He accuses Dallas coaches of preparing the players to play dirty. He tries to make a connection to dirty play and how ironic it is that these plays happened against Brian Westbrook, who is the team’s best player. He accuses Jay Ratliff, Pat Watkins and Jason Hatcher of purposely grabbing Westbrook’s facemask. 

The article is so outrageous that I sadly had to sign up to the comment section and opine on the subject. His article is deplorable and it borders on libel, and I don’t say that just because this is a Dallas Cowboys blog; I say that because it’s the truth. 

It’s true because what Mr. Daly fails to mention or point out in his “journalism” are certain plays that Eagles players committed on the Cowboys: A facemask of Tony Romo, a horse-collar tackle of Marion Barber and a chop block–which did not draw flags. Why? We will never know that. 

But the most-glaring error in his article is that he obviously proves he did not watch the game, or re-watch it, if he was going to write such a critical article about the Dallas Cowboys? To what am I referring? See, there’s proof out there that was not easy to find that bring some objectivity to his article. He avoids the truth. 

Please, just review these pictures:

What exactly is Brian Westbrook doing? Is he just saying hello? What is he grabbing? Why does Mr. Daly not mention this?

Now, the pictures tell a story Mr. Daly does not, and that’s unfortunate. But Daly really pushes the envelope of yellow journalism, as he continues to harp on the subject of which he obviously has very little knowledge:

Fortunately, Westbrook lived to play another day. Maybe the Cowboys will resort to a different form of, uh, discouragement next time – the clothesline, say, or the horse collar. Clearly, he was foremost in their defensive thoughts Monday night, No. 1 on their Most Wanted list. And their roughhouse tactics had the desired effect; he was held to 58 yards rushing and 103 overall.

Mr. Daly continues to push his agenda that the Cowboys were out to injure Westbrook. His crazed article says it was a shame that the highly entertaining game broke the Cable record because his alleged dirty play of the Cowboys makes a joke out of the NFL. That’s not what people show see for a record-breaking game, he clamors. 

Mr. Daly avoids the fact that not one Cowboy was punished or fined after the game, which NFL commissioner Roger Goodell is known to do. The Cowboys didn’t get a letter from the commish. 

There’s a reason for that. The Cowboys did not play a dirty game. The coaches didn’t teach these players to facemask or incur penalties. In fact, anyone who watches the Cowboys knows the coaches were certainly teaching the opposite. 

But it’s a shame that people like Mr. Daly have a job in journalism. It’s a shame that he writes for a paper in Washington, D.C., the home of the Washington Redskins. It’s a shame that he calls himself a journalist.

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

To me it looked like there was a hit on westbrook. I watched the game too, but man every face called and a couple that wasn't called were on 36west. I mean I dont blame westbrook for also grabbing the defenders facemask too. I mean if I was the one getting my head whip-lashed all night I would get pissed and purposely stiff arm to the face mask. Those picture only do justice for Brian Westbrook.

A few things, both hands are not on the facemask. If you look at the picture, the angle presented is deceiving. It would be impossible for both of his hands to be on the facemask. Secondly, an offensive player cannot grab a defensive player's facemask whether it is stiffarm or not. You are a complete fool for coming over here trying to argue that the pictures do not prove anything. 

One more thing.  Your little pictures don't really prove anything as there is no was to tell who initiated the contact.  Who's hand was there first.  Although again it doesn't matter if Westbrook's is there because its a legal stiff arm and I doubt that a stiff arm will twist the person's head around like the face mask that draws a penalty does.

Uh numbnuts the first picture is a downright dirty play.  Man what 3 times his size with both hands on his face mask dragging him down twisting his head around while at it.

For the rest, again numbnuts, that's called a stiff arm.  Most of the great RBs have used it and its completely legal until they change the rule.  I believe there has been some talk about it but for right now what he's doing there is legal.  On the other hand what the Cowboys players are doing is by rule illegal.  Please learn the game of football.

One incident is a mistake but the number of times it was done seems to point to a trend.  Now was it intentional.  I'm not saying injury was intended but was it a calculated plan to stop their best player or was it just in the heat of the game and possibly their best option to take him down and they took it.

Does anyone even read the times? I dont...The ink on the times actually smears onto your hands (no Joke) thats how crappy their newspaper is hahaha I pick up the express in the morning when I riding the metro to work...im so glad im not a fan of these crap ass sports teams here in DC...they suck ASS!!!

"We all knew the Washington Times was a right-wing garbage paper, and a horrible place to work, but we also now know that no one at that paper knows anything about sports,"

LMFAO same thing I was thinking and low and behold you wrote it perfectly!!!

As far as why he wrote the story....... it's washington the sports teams suck here. caps are slightly above average. arenas barely plays yet makes ridiculous amounts of money. skins are arguing on the radio and showing xxx pics. dc united... who? nats blow. They've only got the cowboys to watch and stew about.

the post is flaming liberals and the times is entrenched on the right... i wont pick either them up off the seat when riding the metro

There's no doubt that there was a lot of emotion in this game, and while some of this stuff is intentional (you all know it, if someone says something about momma you better watch your ass), a lot of these facemask incidents are unintentional. It happening to Westbrook is mostly because he is THE GUY for the Eagles. He gets receptions and carries more times than not, and the guy is low in his cuts also, so when a 6'5" guy goes to tackle him with his arms and he is only at hands reach, he will find a handle on something if he can.

As far as the equipment goes, a lot of this has to do with player preference. New equipment comes out all the time, and these guys usually wear what they know. Take McNabb for example. Helmet too big and jersey too tight. It is for a reason. You can't grab a tight jersey and if someone even gets close to the facemask on a loose helmet it looks like his head is about to fall off. AND it works. WHY CHANGE? It's obvious this guy hates the Cowboys and that was the reason for this article. The coaches aren't asking these guys to intentionally do this crap. Come on.

Intentional or not, they sure was a lot of "dirty" illegal plays. Asante Samuel had his face mask grabbed at the end of his interception return, Trent Cole nearly got his head taken off by Flozell Adams on the long TO TD, McNabb was hit late twice, and somebody dived on Jason Avant's leg after he was already down on the ground.

It could all just be a bunch of unintentional coincidences, or the Cowboys coaches could be encouraging dirty play. Nobody knows for sure except the players and the coaches.

Thanks Dave. This article was horrible and yellow journalism. The Cowboys should sue the Washington Times. He says the coaches told players to do this? That is insane!

I hate to say it, Dan.  But you are right.  There was nothing especially dirty about the Cowboy's play on Monday night.  I think Daly doesn't understand the rules changes with the elimination of the 5 yard face mask.  There is no doubt this is causing confusion nationwide.
One of the biggest problems with NFL rules today are that the equipment makes following some of the rules more and more difficult.  You can't lead with your helmet?  OK, makes sense, but with the giant neckbrace and rolls of padding back there, how am i supposed to lead with anything else?  I can't grab the face mask?  Makes sense, but they get bigger and bigger every year.  I can't horse collar tackle?  Fine, but when a guy is running away from me wearing slick, heat shedding artificial materials, what am I supposed to grab on to?
The NFL needs to pay more attention to its equipment.  For instance, why can't the visor that many players use extend fully over the facemask?  That way there's nothing to grab onto.  Why aren't the pads made of the lighter, more flexible materials available out there that the military is even using as body armor?  If the equipment was lighter and more functional, maybe they could avoid some of the accidental injuries and penalties.
At any rate, the Cowboys are no saints, but to say that they are being coached to be dirty is an exaggeration.  Particularly since we have umpteen billion hours of their coaching tapes in HBO vaults right now.  Every team is guilty of individual dirty plays (Roy Williams comes to mind) but there is nothing systematic about any given dirty play the Cowboys have commited.

-DW