Washington Redskins Looked AWFUL
It’s way too early, but did anyone else find enjoyment is watching how awful the Washigton Redskins looked? I sure did.
And it is sure quiet in those parts of the land.
Chirp Chirp. I can hear the crickets here.
Fans clamoring that playcalling and new coach sucks.
Where was Chris Cooley?
Awww, they lost, and he’s angry. WAAAA WAAA.
A few things:
- I told you Jason Campbell sucks
- I told you Colt Brennan will be the starter in six weeks
- Jason Taylor? Who?
- Your coach won’t last one year in Washington if he goes 3-13




















your right on all accounts…they suck i live in the shadow of fedex field. i cant wait till i go to work to hear the delusional and crybaby deadskins fans
September 5th, 2008 at 7:45 amI have no problem saying they were downright terrible yesterday. Campbell was lost….Taylor did nothing. Burress ran all over us as did Jacobs, and the “4 minute offense” as some call it was terrible. I mean who runs the ball when you need two scores that late in a game?
September 5th, 2008 at 8:05 amI haven’t given up yet though. We have almost a week and a half to prepare for the Saints and fix some of our woes. Getting Springs back will provide better defense and maybe Taylor will show up once his knee is 100% again. Maybe our best bet is to lose again next week and try to follow the Giants plan from last year.
Our offense was pathetic, but saying you hear crickets from our site when it’s actually pretty active is a bit unfair. We’ve posted more articles in the last few days than you have buddy, including one I wrote late last night.
We looked like a team trying a new offense with a rookie coach. Gee, I wonder why that is. Maybe because that’s exactly what we are. Things will improve when the players get more experience with Zorn’s system under their belt. Zorn will get better with his playcalling. All in all, it could have been much much worse.
September 5th, 2008 at 8:30 amThe redskins following the G-girls path from last year….hahaha thats funny but it aint gonna happen. I predicted the skins will go 4-12 and so far they are playing the part. This sunday, 4.15 in cleveland you will what a real team looks like….How ’bout them Cowboys!!!!!
September 5th, 2008 at 8:34 amGuy, shut your mouth. The chirp chirp had more to do with little comment about the loss last night. Get over yourself. God your team looked awful.
September 5th, 2008 at 9:02 amSecondly, no you have not posted more than me, Guy. You never will. No Redskins will ever be better at anything I do, understand me? Glad we got that straight. Now let’s discuss your team’s week one disgusting offensive performance. That looked like a Division 2 team in college. Appalachian State Redskins.
September 5th, 2008 at 9:03 amHOLY FUCKING SHIT. What an absolute disaster of a website this is, hahaha.
Thanks for the link friend, it netted me exactly one big hit. And you’re talking about chirping crickets?
If you weren’t such a fucking dickhead maybe more people would read your site. A front page post about another team’s player (calling him a “pusssaaay” omg you are so clever I get it! He’s a “pussaayyy!!” hysterical) isn’t going to cut it. There are a lot of really, really great Cowboys blogs, and fans, out there in the vast internet. You are not one of them, you are not relevant to that pocket of fans. There is no shame being insignificant on the internet, but there is about being abrasive over that fact.
Whatever.
September 5th, 2008 at 9:34 amFirst off evil Skins fan, don’t come here and start cussing on my site. We are good people here and we don’t throw around nasty words.
Where’s Lance?
September 5th, 2008 at 9:52 amWay to over react to one game there, Dan. Yes, we looked terrible for a quarter. Our defense looked very good for three quarters. Our offense never got rhythm against a good defense. Let’s just wait a few weeks before we pronounce anyone dead.
-DW
September 5th, 2008 at 10:01 amYou are a disaster. This website is a disaster. We can talk about why I’m upset (not at you, of course, you gave me hits and a good laugh) or we can talk about how obviously insecure you are. For example, front page post on your DALLAS COWBOYS website is about how LaRon Landry is a “pussaaay”. There is shadenfreud and then there’s… whatever it is you have.
Appalachian State Redskins? That’s now your favorite joke, used twice in the last hour. Was it such a hit the first time around?
What is a greasemonkey? Do you have a problem with mechanics? Why am I a mechanic? What about my post suggests that I’m a mechanic?
You don’t come to my site because I’ve never posted a link to your website calling you a whiner. Before today, I’d never heard of your website, and I live in Dallas Cowboy country and read Dallas Cowboys blogs daily.
More free advice: How do you think it looks to readers of the site that you post that one super awsome time The Big Lead linked to your site? It looks desperate.
That’d be excusable if the content was so great which, I don’t need to tell you, it ain’t. Above is around a 100 word post discussing, among other things, someone else’s team, someone else’s blog, sprinkled with clever verbiage such as “WAAAA WAAA” (that’s insight!) and you congratulating yourself. What is in this post that I would want to read even if I were a Dallas Cowboys fan? How are you going to get readers if you don’t post anything the people this site is directed at could possibly want to read?
The cherry on top is that you happen to be a complete jerk. None of the above would bother me in the least if you were a nice guy, because I don’t care if you want to waste your time writing online to a tiny and impossible to grow audience about the Dallas Cowboys, or anything for that matter. It’s not a crime to be a bad writer, most people (the two of us, for instance) are not great writers. And you could have your little outlet for talking Cowboys that no one reads but no big shakes on me, either, except for the fact that you’re a jerk. The instant you start criticizing other people’s content, start calling other people names is when it becomes my business to make you look stupid. Fortunately that’s not tough to do.
This is advice, not some silly e-demand — “don’t come here and start cussing on my site.” why not? What are YOU going to do about it? — I think your site would be much, much better off if you were less abrasive towards other people’s work. Some people can get away with being mean because they’re talented. You aren’t one of those people. You would have a much better chance at producing an at least not-total-disaster website if you used honey instead of the stick.
Ugh, what a waste of time.
September 5th, 2008 at 10:05 amWow. Skin Patrol is my new favorite reader. Congrats. I love this guy.
Skin Patrol, I did not criticize your post or your Web site. I merely pointed out your page and said you were whining about a week one loss. Dude, get a grip. My readers will get a kick out of your site and your whine and cheese post. You need to take a Xanax or something, bud. Holy cow.
Also Skin, I’ve been linked on The Big Lead several times. Thanks for looking though.
September 5th, 2008 at 10:21 amThis conversation is approaching an end, here are my final words:
You criticized someone else’s website in the same post that you pointed your readers to a link from mine with the really super awesome lede “WAA WAA”. Whether your intended anything vicious by that is really irrelevant, since you left no doubt as to what kind of person you were in the comments. You’re a jerk. I don’t have patience for jerks.
If you post bad content, which you do, I don’t care. That bothers me not. If you post bad content and then criticize other people’s content, criticize other people’s websites, then I care, ESPECIALLY if you are a jerk about it.
If you don’t want me over here criticizing your site, then please, I’m asking politely, don’t ever link to my website again. I’ll get by without the 2-3 hits. I am perfectly content letting you sit in relative anonymity so long as you don’t ever associate the train wreck that is thelandryhat.com with my website again. If I see another hit, come over here and find another useless post with trash content, we’ll have this discussion again and again and again. That’s a waste of time for BOTH OF US.
To sum up my advice from earlier, a website can only succeed if it its author is talented OR civil. It doesn’t appear that you are either talented or civil. You can’t become talented overnight, but you can immediately alter the jerkish tone of your posts. I don’t really care what you decide to do, just don’t include me next time.
September 5th, 2008 at 10:27 am“Also Skin, I’ve been linked on The Big Lead several times.”
If my point were that bragging about the inconsequential blog goal of getting linked to by The Big Lead (do you think this is a big deal, difficult, indicative of your talents as a writer?) makes you look insecure, why do you think it would improve on this image by… bragging about getting linked to by The Big Lead?
September 5th, 2008 at 10:29 amOMG! Is it all that serious that you have to go on and on? Why would someone try to look secure on a blog? Are you calling your website the big lead to compensate for something else that may not be that big? GAL Skin Patrol.
September 5th, 2008 at 12:29 pmWow the ‘Skins looked horrid last night. Maybe they should just hang up the cleats for the season right now. Just sayin’.
September 5th, 2008 at 12:37 pmWell the defense was giving the Giants a hard time in the third quarter, trying to keep the team in the game. The offense is abysmal! Jim Zorn looks lost. And the DB’s need to hold on to the ball! Eli could have thrown up to four int’s last night.
September 5th, 2008 at 1:42 pmok so i also think that colt brennan will take over the team jason cant handle the pressure
September 5th, 2008 at 4:00 pmSorry about being late to this party, but just to put in my two cents, I do concede the point that Dan is better than me at a lot of things. Here are a few examples…
1. He is better at being a homer.
September 5th, 2008 at 5:07 pm2. He is better at lying and severely distorting the truth.
3. He is better at telling people to shut up and getting ignored.
4. He’s better at calling people crude, unimaginative insults.
5. He is better at having a hissy fit when his team invariably chokes in the playoffs.
So I guess you’re right Dan. You *ARE* better than me in a lot of things! Wow!
As a Cowboys fan, I think this year we will be able to laugh at the Skins. However, I think they have positioned themselves to surpass the Eagles and eventually the Giants. You can’t judge a quarterback until his third or fourth season. Forget what you saw prior to then. Campbell will be a stud this year or next, and their wide receivers will start to come into their own as Campbell does. Short term losers but long-term winners.
September 5th, 2008 at 8:12 pmI don’t think anyone would have wanted to play in New York last night. Opening night of the NFL. National audience. Playing the superbowl champions AT HOME in front of a crowd that just got totally fired up by that gap-toothed monstrosity hiding inside a giant fucking lombardi trophy. You can’t tell me any of you would want your team to play under those conditions. Now, we still sucked, but that team was riding high and playing spectacularly in the first quarter for a reason.
September 5th, 2008 at 8:37 pmThe Saints got whupped last year by the colts under similar conditions. There’s some games that just give the home team just a huge edge because of emotion. I don’t envy whatever team plays the last game ever in Texas Stadium either. That would just suck.
Hey ForeSkin Patrol, quit yer bitchin! Your site is awful! You might claim that the fact that you’re less biased than TLH makes you a better blogger, but people looking for straight news will go to a straight news site like ESPN or NFL.com or something like that. When you come to sites like yours or TLH, you’re going to get some slant. How much slant is in the hands of the blogger.
Jason Campbell looked terrible. On your site, you said “Jason Campbell didn’t play so hot.” He was 5 of 10 for 40 yards at the end of the 3rd quarter. That’s awful. That’s worse than awful. That’s an abortion of a game for a quarterback, especially in the west coast offense. You criticized 3.5 yards per carry more than a 50% completion rate. You also forgot to mention Carlos Rogers getting burned all over the field by Plaxico. 10 catches for 133 yards from Plax against your top corner.
If you can’t take the criticism from TLH, then don’t pop up over here calling this blog terrible. I’m not saying it’s perfect by any stretch of the imagination, but yours is worse.
September 7th, 2008 at 8:02 amSkin Patrol could’ve just sent an e-mail to landryhat. Wouldn’t have to read his bullshit.

September 7th, 2008 at 11:22 pm