Bengals Won’t Part With Chad Johnson

by Cowboys

Are the Cincinnati Bengals out of their mind? Chad Johnson has already said he doesn’t plan to play for the Bengals ever again. So, in comes the Washington Redskins and Daniel Snyder, who offered their first-round pick this year and another pick in 2009 that could be a first rounder depending on how well Johnson plays for the Crapskins, and the Bengals turn it down.

ESPN reported about it this morning here.  This is the kind of action the Crapskins fanettes have been desiring all year.

Do the Bengals think Johnson is bluffing? If not, what exactly do they want for Johnson? I guess nothing, because they plan to keep a player who has already said he won’t play for them. They must think he is bluffing.

The Bengals have not only rejected the Redskins, but two other NFC East suitors — the Dallas Cowboys  and Philadelphia Eagles — have been informed that there has been no change in the team’s position that Johnson will not be traded.

I think this is the kicker:

Trading Johnson also would mean Cincinnati would take an $8 million salary cap hit, but that amount could be split over the next two years. Additionally, as one anonymous owner told ESPN.com, “There’s nothing wrong with dead money. It’s cash already paid and it’s cash back in your pocket that you don’t have to spend, especially with the [high] amount of everyone’s salary cap these days.”

I am not sure what exactly this means, but I assume it means the Bengals really don’t lose out on getting rid of Johnson, other than the salary cap hit, which affects future signings. But the Bengals don’t make a lot of free agent splashes. So what the heck is going on?

If the Bengals had any intelligent person running the show, they would get rid of Johnson (The Crapskins offer seemed pretty sweet) and use that extra pick to draft a new wide receiver with a better attitude and one who is less pompous. That won’t be hard to do.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

I'd rather have the 9 picks.  Unfortunately I have no influence over Dan Snyder.  And "Riggo's Rag"  also made the statement that DW was on crack when he wrote that piece.  Don't start bringing up crazy predictions buddy, or I might have to remind your viewers how you predicted Terry Glenn was going to have a monster comeback in the playoffs and would score two touchdowns in the superbowl.  Oh wait, I just did.  Have a cookie.

Tulip, whatever. POint is Riggos Rag made the statement. It was completely off base. You've got 9 picks and not one overpaid bum receiver to show for it. As we get Anquan Boldin, you guys can fight for the whiney Johnson.

Please don't confuse me with Dave, the other writer for Riggo's Rag.  I never said we could have Johnson for a 2nd rounder and I vewed DW's claims with skepticism all along.  I might make some crazy statements from time to time, but that one wasn't me.  

http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080422/SPT02/304220098 ... NOW, I heard on ESPN that Marvin Lewis initially refuted that he received the offer, and then called Mortenson and confirmed that the report was accurate and that he misunderstood what was reported.  I think it says it all in the above article.  It also proves what I said earlier about Marvin Lewis just wanting to screw Chad Johnson over for acting out and threatening the organization.  He claims once again that he will not trade Chad Johnson for ANYTHING, and that he would rather him just sit out and lose the money.

The Bengals are retarded...they at least should try to get something (like one of our 1st rounders) since he is not planning to play for them. The salary cap is not an excuse because if he really wants out he could re-do his contract so the salary cap hit wont be so big. Someone tell Stripe Hype to relay this message to his team.

The Truth, post a link. That is hilarious. Marvin Lewis is ready to pull the trigger!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tulip was saying that it would only take a 2nd rounder to land johnson...Obviously thats not the case and it seems to me it would take both of our 1st rounders to make the bengals bite...I much rather keep them and get a promising WR in either 1st or 2nd round.

Now, Marvin Lewis is saying that the Redskins never made that offer that was reported earlier by ESPN and The Washington Post.  This is according to The Cincinnati Enquirer.

I don't know what the Bengals are thinking.  I think the salary cap hit plays a role, but its not the end of the world.  I think its mostly to make a statement.  I think they count on him playing, but if he stays true to what he's claiming and doesn't play, they would rather own him and keep him out of the league, UNPAID, than actually get something for him and help rebuild after the loss of him.  Whatever the case, this probably proves that he's no longer an option for the Cowboys unless we part with BOTH 1st rounders this year, and I hope we don't do that.  The Redskins and Eagles will probably top any deal we'd be able to make besides that.