That No.1 Pick Means What? It Means Darren McFadden For Dallas

With the Miami Dolphins flaunting its No. 1 pick, the Landry Hat decided to review the last decade of top picks. How did these picks turn out? Hopefully, we will get a better idea if what Miami is doing is completely dumb, or superbly intelligent.

1998: Peyton Manning. Grade A+. He has a Super Bowl ring and Miami would love to have this guy.

1999: Tim Couch. Yeah, not quite Ryan Leaf, but Couch is better off sitting on one.

2000: Courtney Brown. Injuries slowed him down after a promising rookie season. I’d say flop.

2001: Michael Vick. He was never going to win the team a Super Bowl, but I don’t think he was a flop. He was a great athlete. But his penchant for dog fighting makes him one embarrassing catch. He’s been thrown to the sea now. Bye.

2002: David Carr. S U C K S. The trend isn’t looking too great so far for that top pick, is it?

2003: Carson Palmer: Certainly a top 8 quarterback. It is still hard to say where this guy is going to go, but at least he is still a starter and well liked. He has opportunity to do well still

2004: Phillip Rivers/Eli Manning: I’d say these guys are pretty equal so it doesn’t really matter in the long run who got who. Both are OK. Manning seems to be stepping into a mold his father gave him. Rivers is just a prick but he plays hard. I’d say a lot of teams would be happy with one of these guys.

2005: Alex Smith. SO far, not good. San Fran is really relying on this guy and he just can’t seem to pull it together.

2006: Mario Williams. Come on, why the hell isn’t this guy in the Pro Bowl. This was a good pick. He just needed to warm up.

2007: JaMarcus Russell: Who knows, right?

Over all, I think Miami might be doing itself well if they traded the top pick. Even if Dallas takes Darren McFadden, it is a complete risk. Not one running back has been selected at the top pick once in this decade. That surprised me. This is going to be a very interesting off season folks.

Tags: , ,
Comments
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

The NFL obviously needs to fix something with the rookie salary scale, since everyone of the teams that you listed above is in Salary Cap hell, and stuck at 0-16...oh snap! what am I talking about...aside from the Raiders (Zombie ownership duo of Al Davis & Fidel Castro) and the 49ers (Morons who would rather pay attention to Youngstown State women's basketball than a 5 time superbowl winner) have themselves in decent shape financially and haven't been horrible dissapointments in terms of wins & losses.  Your premise sucks teh ballz...

This story is overplayed!

Forgot to change the name there. TO could never make that much sense.

I don't think there is any player in this draft worthy of the number 1 pick. McFadden is probably the closest to it, but the draft value of RBs has dropped over the years. Most teams realize you can find good RBs like Marion Barber(4th round), and Brian Westbrook(3rd round) in the later rounds.

Kickholder, yep, I thought so too. But he is such a prick. I loved the guts.

Tough to argue with the selections of Rivers and Manning, given that one is in the Super Bowl while the other was in the AFC title game.  I agree that Rivers is a prick, but playing with a torn ACL is pretty damn tough.

The rookie salary structure is so fucked up, it makes the 1st pick so risky.  When you're committing such a huge percentage of your salary cap to a guy who hasn't even taken a single snap in the nfl, it's just wrong.  Add to that the fact that a very large percentage of 1st round draft picks end up being busts, and you've got a recipe for disaster.  In some ways it's WORSE to have a really high pick because if you pick wrong, you're not just getting a terrible player, but you're stuck in a six year contract with him.